Breast Augmentation Revision Gallery By Cosmetic Surgeon - Dr Robert Goldman
Perth And Cairns Cosmetic Studios
Please find below some example cases of Breast Augmentations Revisions by Cosmetic Surgeon, Dr Robert Goldman.
Note: The most common reason for performing breast augmentation revisions is where the previous augmentation placed the implants behind the pectoral muscles. This results in a higher percentage of undesirable shape outcomes that can worsen over time. Also, women often request a revision where the original surgeon used implants that were too small. Therefore the consultation process with your Cosmetic Surgeon is a very important part in ensuring the best breast implants and options are chosen.
Case 1372 - Breast Augmentation RevisionPatient Age : 25 Height & Weight : 5ft 5in - 62kg Revision Breast Implant Placement : Subglandular Revision Breast Incision Type : Inframammary Pre-Revision Breast Implants : 350cc Both Sides Revision Implants : 385cc Both Sides Textured. Ultrahigh Profile. Pre-Revision Bra Size : 10D Post-Revision Bra Size : 12D Cosmetic Surgeon : Dr Robert Goldman Case Notes:This patient had her initial augmentation overseas and she was concerned with unevenness across the lower parts of her breasts,due to the fact that her implants were placed in the submuscular position. Dr Goldman has corrected this by using slightly larger Ultrahigh Profile implants and the patient is now completely satisfied with the result | ![]() | ![]() |
Case 1537 - Breast Augmentation RevisionPatient Age : 25 Height & Weight : 152cm - 61kg Revision Breast Implant Placement : Subglandular Revision Breast Incision Type : Inframammory Revision Implants : 465cc Both Sides. Textured. Ultra High Profile. Pre-Revision Bra Size : 10DD Post-Revision Bra Size : 10E Cosmetic Surgeon : Dr Robert Goldman Case Notes :Original augmentation was performed by another Surgeon using submuscular placement. The patient was unhappy with the size of her implants and requested a revision to further increase her breast size. For her revision, Dr Goldman used Ultra High Profile breast implants. Also, the replacements were not placed behind the muscles, but new pockets were created in front of the muscle (subglandular), providing a significantly better end result. After her initial breast augmentation, she was a 10DD and after Dr Goldman's revision was a 10E with an improved shape.
| ![]() | ![]() |
Case 1644 - Breast Augmentation RevisionPatient Age : 48 Height & Weight : 165cm - 50kg Revision Breast Implant Placement : Subglandular Revision Breast Incision Type : Inframammary Revision Implants : 315cc Both Sides. Textured. Ultra High Profile Pre-Revision Bra Size : 10B Post-Revision Bra Size : 10D Cosmetic Surgeon : Dr Robert Goldman Case Notes :This patient's original augmentation was performed in New Zealand. She is a particularly petite woman but was unhappy with the size and shape of her breasts after the initial augmentation. The reason being that the implants were too small and also the implants were placed under the pectoral muscles. The gap between her breasts was too great. Dr Goldman revised her breast augmentation with larger implants and also converted the augmentation from under to over the muscle (subglandular). Overall, she is very happy with her results. Her bra size before her initial augmentation was 10AA. After her initial aumentation- 10B and after Dr Goldman's revision 10D. | ![]() | ![]() |
Case 1723 - Breast Augmentation RevisionPatient Age : 42 Height & Weight : 160cm - 48kg Revision Breast Implant Placement : Subglandular Revision Breast Incision Type : Inframammory Revision Implants : 400cc Both Sides. Optima Very High Profile Pre-Revision Bra Size : 10C Post-Revision Bra Size : 10DD Case Notes :This patient's original augmentation was performed in New Zealand using a sub-pectoral implant placement. Her original bra size before the augmentation was a small B cup. The implants used were 300cc and she moved to a C cup. The patient experienced worsening shape on the right side with change typical of submuscular implants. Dr Goldman used Very High Profile implants to replace her medium profile implants. Also, the replacements were not placed behind the muscles, but new pockets were created in front of the muscle (sub glandular), providing a significantly better result. Her final bra size was a 10DD. | ![]() | ![]() |
Case 1765 - Breast Augmentation RevisionPatient Age : 23 Height & Weight : 156cm - 52kg Revision Breast Implant Placement : Subglandular Revision Breast Incision Type : Inframammary Revision Breast Implants : 560cc Both Sides : Extra Full Pre-Revision Bra Size : 12C Post-Revision Bra Size : 12DD Case Notes :Dr Goldman performed a revision augmentation 6 months after the original surgery. The original operation was performed in Thailand where the surgeon placed the implants in a submuscular position; this means that the implants were placed under the pectoral major muscle. This is the reason for the unusual and undesirable shape of the breasts prior to the breast augmentation revision. Please note that the corrective cosmetic surgery located the implants on top of the muscle and the patient also requested a significant upsizing. The end result is an obvious improvement. The patient's bra size before her original procedure was 10B. After her first operation was 12C and after Dr Goldman's revision augmentation - 12DD. | ![]() | ![]() |









